Thursday, November 7, 2013

To Be or Not To Be. . . (Hamlet Post #3) (Blog Post #15)

1. SOLILOQUY ANALYSIS: 
Imagery that refers to the uncertainty of death: 
"To sleep, perchance to dream-- ay, there's the rub. For in that sleep of death what dreams may come when we have shuffled off this mortal coil, must give us pause...there's the respect that makes calamity of so long life" (3.1.66-73)
This quote by Hamlet is his ponderance of death. Since death is better than living by far, he wonders why people do not commit suicide to quickly end their suffering and concludes that "the rub" (aka "the catch") is our uncertainty in death. This leads to our hesitation and fear of the afterlife which, for all that is know, may be worse than life itself. Hamlet concludes that it is this uncertainty that prolongs our suffering in life.

Imagery that refers to the negative experiences of life: 
"The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune" (3.1.60) 
"To die, to sleep...to end the heartache and the thousand natural shocks that flesh is heir to" (3.1.62-64)
"Th' oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely,
The pangs of despised love, the law's delay,
The insolence of office, and the spurns
That patient merit of th' unworthy takes" (3.1.70-76)
Hamlet considers a range of worldly sufferings and questions why we should live through this when a simple solution is readily available at hand. In his list, he includes wrongs others have inflicted upon us, luckless events, and the continual heartache the living is subject to. He tries to reason that, with these negative experiences, death should be much easier than life.

Appeals: 
o Ethos: Appeal to the character of the speaker
"Thus conscience does make cowards of us all,
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought."
Here hamlet questions his own character; he weighs his bravery and realizes that thought has condemned his previous resolution to kill himself to cowardice. In this, he decides that man is inherently courageous enough to carry out any action but hesitation and prolonged thought stunts action.

o Pathos: Appeal to the emotions or interest of the audience 
"For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
Th' oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely,
The pangs of despised love, the law’s delay,
The insolence of office, and the spurns
That patient merit of th' unworthy takes,
When he himself might his quietus make
With a bare bodkin?" (3.1.70-79)
This is Hamlet's questioning of the audience, asking who would rather bear the burdens of life than seek the peace found only in death. He appeals to the audience by creating a list of relatable sufferings through which the audience may draw connections between Hamlet and themselves, sympathizing with his character and his predicament.

o Logos: Appeal to logic  
"Who would fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscovered country from whose bourn
No traveler returns" (3.1.79-83)
Confused as to why men do not simply kill themselves, Hamlet reasons that, logically, the only reason for our perseverance in life is our "dread of something after death" (3.1.81). Rather than our dread of death itself, Hamlet has concluded that men are turned weak instead by their fear of an afterlife and the possibility that this afterlife may be worse than their current condition.

Literary Devices:
Paradox: The prevalent paradox throughout his soliloquy is the weighing of life and death. It is paradoxical that Hamlet, while living, should so ardently pursue death. Driving to death by life itself, he is also driven from death by the fear of what may follow. 
Parallelism:  Hamlet compares life and death, repeating the phrase "To..." as in "to live....to sleep....to die....to dream...." to emphasize the active doing each action requires.
Synecdoche: Hamlet uses synecdoche is used to generalize Hamlet's pessimistic view on life as he uses recent events as an umbrella over a spectrum of unfortunate events.
Tone: Hamlet's tone throughout his soliloquy is predominantly contemplative as he riddles out the paradox of life. However, at certain moments, he becomes more emotional (especially when considering all the sufferings of life) and the tone shifts to frustrated or melancholy. Still, by the end of his soliloquy, Hamlet has shifted back to a pensive and contemplative tone as he ponders the meaning of life versus the gains of death. 
Diction: The diction used is very specific and carefully selected. An example of this diction in use is when Hamlet interchanges "sleep" with "death". This develops a peaceful outlook as well as Hamlet's yearning for death, establishing death not as a morbid tragedy but a reprieve from life.
Metaphor: The two primary metaphors Hamlet uses are comparing death to sleep and the afterlife to an unknown world from which "no traveler returns". This establishes a peaceful view of death but also a mysterious and terribly shrouded vision of the afterlife.

Evidence of the following comparisons: life on earth, afterlife, death, humans, thinking. 
When Hamlet lists all the worldly ailments that befall the human race, he compares them to the safe haven that would be found in death. Drawing from this, he continues to state that this sanctuary is not permanent but rather uncertain as we do not know what will follow (aka the afterlife). He questions the purpose of humans in living and wonders why suffers do not simply end their suffering but concludes that it is our thought that restrains us from doing this very deed. The more we think upon an issue, the more "cowardly" our resolution becomes. 

Identify at least three oppositions present in the arguments Hamlet makes. 
1. Hamlet wants to escape the suffering of life but hesitates, considering if it is nobler to suffer than it is to simply die.
2. Many people suffer yet do not simply end their suffering: This is because, though they do not fear death itself, they fear the afterlife and it is this uncertainty that stumps them.
3. Though Hamlet thinks of death as sleep, this sleep comes with its own dreams, some of which may be worse than those offered by reality.

What eternal philosophical questions does Hamlet ponder? 
Hamlet ponders whether is is nobler to suffer through life as others do or to take it upon himself to end his suffering early. He also wonders why more people do not take this course of action as it is, to him, the easy solution.

What conclusions does Hamlet draw? 
During his soliloquy, Hamlet concludes that it is our fear of the unknown- the suffering beyond life on Earth- that restrains our will to end our worldly suffering.

2. ACTING ANALYSIS 

In LAWRENCE OLIVER's delivery of Hamlet’s famous “To be or not to be” soliloquy, music is the leading mis en scene component. In the beginning of the scene, the music is very suspenseful as the camera winds up a spiral staircase, speeding up as it ascends until it pans to the sky. From there it zooms down and we see a view of a toiling sea with Hamlet standing at the edge of a cliff or outcrop overlooking the waves. The costume is very specific to the time-period and includes the full ensemble worn by the men of Shakespeare’s time. The music here is slower paced as the camera zooms into his mind, showing his brain to emphasize the mental rather than physical struggle taking place. To make his speech itself stand out amidst the rest of the scene, the music abruptly stops when he begins speaking. However, though we hear his voice, throughout much of his soliloquy, Hamlet is not verbally speaking; instead we are hearing his thoughts speak. His eyes are closed and he speaks at a slow and measured pace, with a contemplative tone that is not deeply emotional. At the end of the scene, after he has dropped the sword into the ocean, Hamlet stands, turns, and walks into a fog at the edge of the screen and descends into the fog as the music restarts. The use of music and visual effects establishes the mood of the piece as it begins sharp and suspenseful but fades into contemplative mystery.

The beginning of this version of Hamlet’s soliloquy begins with MEL GIBSON (Hamlet) walking down a flight of stairs. Here lighting is very important as it visually shows Hamlet descending from light and into darkness as he sinks into the depths of his darkest thoughts. There is no music and the only sound is that of Hamlet’s footsteps occasionally breaking the silence. His soliloquy begins gradually as he whispers, “to be or not to be…that is the question”. He speaks slightly faster than Olivier had but this does not seem rushed, it simply matches up with his body movement throughout his speech. He is also more emotional and ranges from morose towards the situation to frustrated at himself as he wanders through the morgue. The setting itself is another important aspect of mis en scene. It is only fitting that Hamlet be contemplating death in a place of the dead; this juxtaposes Hamlet’s own life with the stillness of those around him.

In ETHAN HAWKE’s portrayal, Hamlet is seen wandering through the aisles of a local Blockbuster with a knitted cap upon his head. It had been the director’s choice to modernize the setting while maintaining the traditional plot. However, this effect is not as efficient as the others had been in exposing the serious nature of this soliloquy. Though his verbal delivery is thoughtful, the setting detracts from the severity of the scene—for after all, he is contemplating suicide. The music present throughout the scene is grave and very low which fuels a mood somewhat contradictory to that established by the setting. Throughout the scene, the camera occasionally pans to a movie screen on which a war movie is playing. Explosions blast the air and the scene is of chaos and destruction; this may go to show Hamlet’s mental state as it contrasts with his outer physical control.

The dominant mis en scene component in KENNETH BRANAGH's “To be or not to be” soliloquy is the setting. Hamlet stands in front of a mirror in a stately room within the castle rather than outside or in another depressing setting as had been portrayed in Olivier and Gibson’s scenes. The room is clean and very bright, with white as the most prevalent color; the effect of this is in highlighting Hamlet’s dark mourning attire as well as the figuratively darkened state of his mind as he delivers his soliloquy. He speaks towards his reflection which lends a somewhat literal effect of self-reflection to the scene as well as establishing the internal struggle rather than the external as the camera focuses on Hamlet confronting himself rather than another character. Throughout the scene, he interacts with no one aside from his reflection, drawing a sword at it at one point. After he begins to speak, music gradually begins-- one note at a time-- and adds to the intensity of this pivotal scene. Hamlet’s voice fades towards the end of his soliloquy though he stands still, observing his reflection, when Ophelia enters the room and ends the scene.

OPHELIA:
O Hamlet, to whom I had been so close, he now stands speaking as if to air, swearing to himself, and contemplating eternal rest. He looks into a mirrored wall and brandishes a sword, I do hope he means no harm. However his tone suggests quite the alternative. How bright and clean this castle seems, struck quite against his grieving robes and darkened mind. May his plague pass by him soon, the grief tearing at his soul strikes daggers at my own. I cannot stand this sickly spirit, this madness that has possessed his bright mind. He quiets, near the end of his speech. Aware is he that I stand beyond these doors? Silent shall I stay? Nay, I will join him.

The one element of mis en scene this portrayal of Hamlet lacked is music. Though the few notes played encourage a grave mood, sound could have more effectively been utilized to set Hamlet’s mental state. He is conflicted, frustrated, and depressed- such emotions cannot be conveyed through only a few notes. Were the music varied, the mood of the scene would have shifted with his tone as Hamlet progressed through these various emotions through the duration of his speech. His speech itself was very emotional as well as contemplative and this could have only been further enhance by the presence of slightly more music. The lighting could also have been varied for effect. Throughout the scene, the setting and lighting remain static and unchanging though it is obvious to the audience that Hamlet has morphed through numerous emotional phases just in the course of his speech. Were the setting varied to mirror these progressions, his growth would have been more highlighted as the audience could visually observe his mental development throughout the soliloquy.

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

"I will find you. . . and I will kill you." (Hamlet Post #2) (Blog Post #14)

"I will find you...and I will kill you."
This is the tagline of Pierre Morel's 2008 film Taken, about a retired CIA agent seeking revenge on his daughter's kidnappers. The theme of espionage is prevalent throughout the film as protagonist Bryan Mills (Liam Neeson) utilizes his "very specific skill set" (Taken 2008) to track down the men that have taken his daughter Kim and intend to sell her as a prostitute. Revenge fuels the plotline as Bryan travels to Europe, beginning his journey with a phone call to the kidnappers in which he famously states, "I don't know who you are. I don't know what you want... I don't have money. But what I do have are a very particular set of skills... Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you let my daughter go now, that'll be the end of it. I will not look for you, I will not pursue you. But if you don't, I will look for you, I will find you, and I will kill you." (Taken 2008) This scene exhibits both his ruthless pursuit of the villains as well as his love for Kim, who "[he] would sacrifice anything for" (Taken 2008). The father-daughter relationship mirrors that between Polonius and Ophelia. Though Polonius may often be harsh, the protectiveness he maintains towards his daughter reminds the audience that he cares for her nonetheless. Having discovered what he believes to be the cause of Hamlet's madness, Polonius is genuinely concerned and "sorry" that he had not quoted him with "better heed and judgement" (2.1.109).

Ophelia: I sometimes wonder how much Sir Polonius would sacrifice for my name. Would he lay down his life in place of my own? For after all he has become the source for Hamlet's madness. Hamlet, dear Hamlet, do forgive him. For though he commanded me to "repel [your] letters and deny [your] access to me" (2.1.107) he is truly repentful. I know father loves me as much as you do and would never act with foul intent. He meant not to "cast beyond [himself] in [his] opinions" (2.1.113) but to caution our courtship out of love when he commanded me to "not believe [your] vows" (1.3.126). Sacrifice he will commit and as we speak he goes to "seek the king" with your "ecstasy of love" (2.1.99-100) in our sake. T'is a godly blessing, his change of heart!

The quotes embedded above draw similarities between the paternal concern both fathers feel towards their daughters. Bryan Mills had been mistaken in allowing Kim to travel alone and Polonius's fault had been in forbidding Ophelia from interacting with Hamlet. However when the situation becomes severe, both fathers recognize their missteps and are determined to make ammends, with Mills directly seeking revenge and Polonius seeking out King Claudius with his theory. Both fathers declare their willingness to sacrifice for their daughters out of love as they embark on their respective journeys. However, while Mills is more confrontational in his pursuit of revenge, Polonius does not seek revenge but simply to make ammends. Mills' love for Kim may be seen as more consistent as, throughout the movie, he is unwavering in his stance. Contrastingly, Polonius oftentimes treats Ophelia in a condescending manner and utilizes a gender stereotype as well as age bias while speaking with her, making the audience question the true extent of his care for her.

Monday, November 4, 2013

Hamlet Blog Post #1 (Blog Post #13)

This has been a most wretched day. I am conflicted. I know Hamlet loves me, as he has "given countenance to his speech...With almost all the holy vows of heaven" (1.3.113-114) yet my brother holds his doubts. Hamlet is a prince, he reminds me, but dear brother...to judge dear Hamlet on such basis of name alone! For I know for many things "His greatness weigh'd, his will is not his own" (1.3.16-17) yet his will to love me is no one's but his own. Surely one cannot feign such affection. Laertes warns me to fear his love, to take caution in belief "if he says he loves [me]" (1.3.23). Your intent is sincere, but I am not a fool, dear brother. I know fair well he loves me, while you scarce "reck [your] own rede" (1.3.51). Nonetheless your word I will consider, as you are most certainly wiser than I. Our father agrees in full, though need he be so harsh? He scolds me as a fool, a young child lost to meaningless affection and easily swooned. Father, can you not see what I have become? I am no longer a simple child. Yet I say Hamlet has "of late made many tenders Of his affection to me" (1.3.99-100) and you pay no notice, ignoring these proclamations as if they were mist existing solely to shroud my senses. Words you have said not to Hamlet, judgement of his character is sure not yours to make. Yet Laertes is my brother, and Sir Polonius is my father...Have you advice to give me? I shall most graciously accept any outside words on this, for my father's solution is not one I desire. Yet it is my duty to obey their words. "I shall the effect of this good lesson keep, As watchman to my heart" (1.3.45-46). If my father so forbids me to cut these ties...this I shall do in full. O Hamlet, do forgive me!

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Hamlet Ophelia Rationale (Blog Post #12)

I have chosen to embody the character Ophelia throughout the reading of Hamlet. Ophelia seems to be a fairly standard teenage girl, easily swooned but also swayed by the influences and admonishes of her older brother as well as her father. Her 'typical teenage' persona would make her an interesting character that is easy to relate with and naturally embeds herself into the world of social media, loyally reporting the slightest fluctuation with regards to her love life to her band of dedicated followers. Ophelia's character is also an opportunity to analyze gender roles within the time period of Hamlet. Amidst social customs and family relations, Ophelia's youth and female status qualify her as the perfect outlet for an examination of various roles as well as their places in society. Furthermore, Ophelia's perspective offers insight on both Hamlet's as well as Polonius' idea of their relationship. She serves as the link between the two and gives the audience an impression of the actions and reactions taking place on the two conflicting sides. This would allow the audience to either passively observe events or to actively draw individual conclusions based on the events that take place. This makes her a versatile and captivating character that draws the audience into the more serious issues that plague Denmark throughout Hamlet.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

American Drama Assignment- Six Degrees of Separation (Blog Post #10 and #11)




MLA Title Page with AP Prompt Text & Academic Honesty Statement and Summary Sheet

Rationale

Script

MLA Works Cited

15 Storyboard Frames (5 for each scene)

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Life of Pi Creative Project (Blog Post #9)

Text: Life of Pi by Yann Martel
Essence: Human nature contains two sides: peaceful innocence and violent savagery. Only when balanced and controlled can this duo act to benefit the whole and sustain life.

Synopsis: In Yann Martel’s award-winning novel Life of Pi, sixteen year old Piscine (Pi) Patel boards a cargo ship headed for the US with his family. However, a few days into their voyage, the TsimTsum sinks, killing Pi’s family and sending him into the open Pacific with only a lifeboat and an odd assortment of animals, amongst them a Bengal tiger named Richard Parker. Coexistence on the lifeboat proves a challenge and before long only Pi and Richard Parker remain; a fierce competition for dominance ensues in which Pi eventually triumphs. Having tamed Richard Parker, Pi continues to search for land. Meanwhile, his limits are tested by the hunger and relentless elements plaguing both himself and Richard Parker. During this journey, Pi discovers a side of himself beyond feasible imagination and is forced to confront a violent nature exposed by his interaction with Richard Parker and the obstacles of the Pacific. Near Life of Pi’s conclusion, Martel reveals another account of the events aboard the lifeboat. Involving only human inhabitants, this story seems far more believable than Pi’s retelling and brings up questions about who or what Richard Parker really is.

Prompt: 1978. Choose an implausible or strikingly unrealistic incident or character in a work of fiction or drama of recognized literary merit. Write an essay that explains how the incident or character is related to the more realistic of plausible elements in the rest of the work. Avoid plot summary.

Thesis: In Yann Martel’s Life of Pi, protagonist Piscine Patel’s extraordinary oceanic voyage is doubted when another more realistic version of the story is revealed. Parallels drawn between Pi’s original and its retelling expose a confrontation within the coexisting duality present in human nature and its savage quest for dominance.

Creative Project: A quote journal with illustrations of Pi embodying himself, Richard Parker, and finally the duo that leads to his survival and quotes distinguishing between the three stages.

Explanation with 5 quotes:
          The essence of Yann Martel’s novel Life of Pi revolves around the inherent duality of human nature and the balance essential to survival. Within each individual there resides an apparent everyday passivity; however, extreme situations may push us over the edge of this innocent façade and into a deeper animalistic savagery arising from raw desperation. In the case of Piscine Molitar Patel, an arduous journey across the Pacific and all the trials involved trigger the release of his violent alternate nature, embodied by the fictitious Bengal tiger Richard Parker. Throughout his voyage, Pi fluctuates between maintaining his usual peace-loving self and transforming into a violent and unrestrained alter ego. The imbalance between the two puts Pi at a constant risk of destruction: were one to overpower the other, the implications could be fatal. However, as he discovers more about each identity, Pi learns to control the two and manipulate certain aspects of both so as to assist his own survival. It is through this mental development within each individual persona and eventual mastery of both that the core of Martel’s story is revealed. This quote journal captures the essence of Life of Pi by separating the personas of Pi and Richard Parker through their actions and then linking certain element to illustrate a vitally advantageous combination.
          In the beginning of Martel’s novel, Pi is introduced as a slightly timid, decidedly bookish, sixteen year old boy living a typical teenage life in Pondicherry, India wanting little more from life than “to love God” (69). This all changes with his plummet into the oceanic depths of the Pacific and the life-or-death crisis that ensues. However, much as his circumstances have changed, throughout the beginning of his stranded voyage Pi is very much the same boy he had boarded the TsimTsum as. The quotes on Page 1 of the journal portray Pi as he enters his journey. He is uncertain of his abilities and easily frightened by the sight of the weakest tiger, “a wet, trembling, half-drowned, heaving, and coughing three-year-old…”, throwing himself overboard with little deliberation (99-100). He believes his prospects at survival are dim and flights far before any notion of fight is conceived. Pi epitomizes his nonaggressive self even when faced with potential starvation. Though he had successfully caught a fish, “several times [he] started bringing the hatchet down, but couldn’t complete the action” (183). Pi later weeps for the fish he had killed, noting it was the “first living thing he had ever killed” and condemning himself “a killer” (183). This sensitive spirit seen in a young boy contrasts sharply with the coldhearted killer introduced in the following page of the journal.
          Though the same person, life of the boat has forced Pi to adopt certain aspects of his Richard Parker counterpart. This integration of violence is emphasized most clearly in another fishing scene reminiscent of Pi’s first flying fish encounter. Here he has caught a dorado after a day’s work and kills it with “no problem”, taking the hatchet and “vigorously [beating] the fish to death” (185). He attempts to defend his transition from “weeping over the muffled killing of a flying fish to gleefully bludgeoning to death a dorado” with the woes of hunger but eventually concedes that “it is simple and brutal: a person can get used to anything, even to killing” (185). This is extremely out-of-character but can be explained with the adopted savagery of his tenacious but uncontrolled Richard Parker complex. Violent as he is, Pi as Richard Parker pushes himself onwards when the individual Pi would have given up, so much that Pi admits he would not have survived if not for Richard Parker’s companionship. In the journal, Pi’s photo has been replaced with that of Richard Parker, symbolic of his transformation into a savage beast with an undefeatable will to live.
          Richard Parker’s will and endurance forces Pi onwards in terms of survival but at a “terrible cost”: when attacked by another sailor, Richard Parker saves Pi, giving him “a life but at the expense of taking one” (251). With events such as the encounter with the French sailor, Pi realizes that certain aspects of Richard Parker must not be left uncontrolled and vows to train him, aware that a tame Richard Parker may be his only chance at survival. Richard Parker initially opposes this effort but eventually becomes compliant, feeling “a need to oblige” (274). It is shown that, if left alone, the persona of Richard Parker would devour itself. It must be combined with the peaceful nature of Pi himself in order to serve any purpose. Pi decides that instead of “running away from him”, he would “carve out [his] territory” and hold his ground, asserting his own values when challenged (202). In the journal, the combined photo of Pi and Richard Parker embraces two halves of a whole, two halves of Pi Patel. Though one may be less used than the other, both are clearly defined and the photo is seen in color as opposed to the grayscale images that previously left space for ambiguity.

 Works Cited
• Davidtoc. "SparkNotes: Life of Pi."SparkNotes: Today's Most Popular Study Guides. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Oct. 2013.
 • Martel, Yann. Life of Pi: a novel. New York: Harcourt, 2001. Print.